Antitrust proceedings
representation before UOKiK in restrictive-practice and abuse-of-dominance matters.

Competition-law compliance, safe distribution-channel relationships and a whistleblower-protection roll-out — practical, without paralysing sales or everyday decisions.
Competition law increasingly shapes everyday commercial decisions — from pricing policy and distributor agreements, through online sales, to mergers and acquisitions. On top of that comes a new, hard-edged obligation: whistleblower protection. We bring these three related areas together in one team, so you do not have to piece support together from separate providers.
We help design and implement solutions that reduce the risk of proceedings before the President of UOKiK and the European Commission, keep distribution agreements on the safe side of the regulations, and do not hold the business back. We combine regulatory knowledge with litigation experience — we can build a compliance programme and run the case if a dispute arises.
representation before UOKiK in restrictive-practice and abuse-of-dominance matters.
assessing the filing obligation (Polish and EU thresholds), filing strategy and preparation, deadlines and remedies.
on-site and follow-up support during and after an inspection.
leniency applications; damages claims acting for the claimant or the defendant.
programmes, audits and training that reduce the risk of proceedings.
auditing and drafting distribution, agency, franchise and licensing agreements against the EU Vertical Block Exemption Regulation (VBER, Reg. (EU) 2022/720, in force since June 2022).
assessing risk such as resale price maintenance and territorial or customer allocation.
permissibility of marketplace restrictions, MFN/parity clauses and channel price differentiation.
internal channels and a policy compliant with the Whistleblower Protection Act (2024), implementing EU Directive 2019/1937.
whether and from when the obligation applies to you (generally from around 50 people performing gainful work; in certain sectors regardless of headcount).
support running investigations, reviewing HR decisions for retaliation risk, and training for staff handling reports.
When you receive a request or notice from UOKiK. When your company is subject to an inspection or dawn raid. When a planned transaction may require a merger filing and the closing deadline is looming. When you are rebuilding your distribution network or expanding into e-commerce and questions arise about pricing, territories or marketplaces. When you have crossed the headcount threshold and do not yet have a whistleblower channel — or the first report has just come in and you do not know how to handle it safely.
we map the risk: agreements, market practices, procedures.
we recommend action: from contract amendments to a defence strategy in proceedings.
we implement procedures or file submissions and notifications.
we monitor changes, train your team, and respond to incidents.

We operate at the intersection of Polish and EU law: the Act on the Protection of Competition and Consumers and the practice of the President of UOKiK, Articles 101-102 TFEU, the VBER Regulation (EU) 2022/720, and the Whistleblower Protection Act implementing Directive 2019/1937. Specific thresholds, deadlines and sanctions are always assessed against the current legal position of your case.
Manufacturers and suppliers building distribution networks, e-commerce and multichannel brands, companies planning mergers or acquisitions, compliance and HR teams implementing whistleblower protection, and entities in regulated sectors.
Which authority you file with depends on the transaction's turnover thresholds and whether it has an EU dimension — we assess this at the outset and file on the correct side.
Where the concentration has an EU dimension (sufficiently high EU-wide turnover), the European Commission has exclusive jurisdiction; below that but above the national thresholds, UOKiK reviews it — and closing before clearance (gun-jumping) can attract a heavy fine.
As a rule, imposing a fixed or minimum resale price is one of the hardcore restrictions — we check the agreement against the VBER before you sign it.
Resale price maintenance is treated as a restriction "by object", whereas maximum prices and non-binding recommended prices generally remain permissible — we draw the line in the specific clause.
A blanket ban is risky, but qualitative marketplace criteria can be permissible — this is a sensitive area after the 2022 VBER reform, so we assess your specific clause rather than the practice in the abstract.
A total ban on online sales is prohibited; platform restrictions may be acceptable within selective distribution, provided they do not amount to a de facto ban on e-commerce.
Most likely yes — we verify the threshold and deadline and implement the required reporting channel.
The duty to run an internal reporting procedure applies to entities with at least 50 employees, so at ~60 it usually arises; we check how headcount is counted and put the channel, register and anti-retaliation safeguards in place.
Above all, do not take any retaliatory action against the person who reported — that is the most common mistake at this stage.
Their situation must not be worsened (dismissal, demotion, harassment) in connection with the report; in parallel we run a confidential, impartial investigation and secure the documentation.
General information — not legal advice. Thresholds, deadlines and sanctions are verified against the current legal position.
The team to handle your matters — from the first conversation to day-to-day support.

Kinga Miller
Partner, Advocate, Approved Compliance Expert, Approved ESG Officer
Kinga advises on antitrust compliance and whistleblower protection — from policies and training to reporting procedures.

Marta Solarska-Kaleńczuk
Partner, Chief Operating Officer,
Data Protection Officer
Marta specialises in competition law for distribution and authorised-dealer agreements — designing vertical agreements compliant with the VBER.

Michał Wołoszański
Managing Partner,
INSEAD Global Executive MBA, Attorney-at-law
Michał combines corporate practice with competition law across transactions and distribution structures, with a particular focus on new technologies.