Representation in arbitration proceedings
Domestic (including the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce) and international (including under ICC rules), as well as ad hoc arbitration.

We advise companies on disputes resolved outside the state courts — from drafting arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, through representation in arbitration proceedings in Poland and abroad, to pursuing enforcement of an arbitral award.
Arbitration gives businesses what's often missing in the general courts: confidentiality, a faster process, and the ability to choose arbitrators with real industry experience. Those benefits only hold if the arbitration clause is drafted correctly and the dispute strategy is matched to the right institution and rules. We advise at both stages — drafting clauses in commercial and investment agreements, and running the dispute itself.
Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution in which the parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitral tribunal instead of a state court. The award is issued by a tribunal chosen (directly or indirectly) by the parties, not a state judge. Key advantages include greater confidentiality, procedural flexibility, the ability to choose arbitrators with sector-specific expertise, and easier cross-border enforcement thanks to the New York Convention.
An arbitration clause is a contractual provision in which the parties agree to submit future disputes arising from that contract to arbitration instead of state courts. Arbitration institutions such as SAKIG publish recommended model clauses for use in contracts. A well-drafted clause specifies the arbitration institution, the number of arbitrators, and the seat and language of proceedings.
Domestic arbitration concerns disputes between domestic entities, usually resolved before national institutions such as SAKIG. International arbitration covers disputes with a cross-border element — parties from different jurisdictions, export contracts, foreign investment — and is often conducted before institutions such as the ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) or VIAC (Vienna International Arbitral Centre), alongside domestic centers.
| Criterion | Arbitration | Litigation | Mediation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nature of outcome | Binding arbitral award | Binding court judgment | Settlement, subject to both parties' agreement |
| Confidentiality | Confidential as a rule | Public proceedings | Confidential |
| Choosing the decision-maker | Parties select the arbitrator(s) | Court assigns a judge | Parties select the mediator |
| Right of appeal | Limited — application to set aside an award, on a narrow statutory set of grounds | Two-instance system, full appeal | Not applicable — no award is issued |
| Enforcement abroad | New York Convention — recognized in over 170 states | Depends on international treaties / EU law | A settlement requires court approval to become enforceable |
| Cost | Fees per the schedule of the arbitration institution (e.g. SAKIG) | Court fees per the statutory schedule | Usually lowest |
This comparison is general — the right route depends on the specific contract and dispute. Arbitration fees are set by the schedule of the relevant institution.

Filing a request for arbitration based on an arbitration clause or a separate arbitration agreement.
The parties select the arbitrator(s), or they are appointed under the institution's rules.
Exchange of submissions, evidence, usually a hearing before the tribunal.
The tribunal issues an award binding on the parties.
If the losing party does not comply voluntarily, the winning party applies to a state court for an enforcement order.
An arbitral award binds the parties from the moment it is issued, but — unlike a state court judgment — it is not automatically an enforceable title. Enforcement requires recognition or a declaration of enforceability by the competent state court. Abroad, the key instrument is the New York Convention of 10 June 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards — Poland has been a party since 1961, and the Convention has been ratified by over 170 states, making an arbitral award one of the most readily enforceable outcomes in international trade.
New York Convention (1958)
contracting states recognizing and enforcing foreign arbitral awards. Poland has been a party since 1961.
In mediation, the parties work with a neutral mediator to reach their own agreement — the mediator does not issue a ruling. Arbitration ends with a binding award issued by the arbitrators. Mediation works well when the parties want to preserve a business relationship and reach a flexible agreement; arbitration is the right choice when a final, binding, and enforceable outcome is needed. The two can also be combined sequentially within a single contract.
The Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in Warsaw (SAKIG) is one of Poland's leading arbitration institutions, maintaining a list of recommended arbitrators and operating under its own Arbitration Rules (2025 edition). We conduct proceedings both before SAKIG and before other domestic and international institutions.
Domestic (including the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce) and international (including under ICC rules), as well as ad hoc arbitration.
In commercial, investment and corporate agreements.
Enforceability proceedings, including under the New York Convention.
Risk assessment, choice of forum (arbitration vs. general courts) and strategy.
Cross-border disputes, choice of arbitral institution and governing law.
Arbitration is a private proceeding in which the parties choose the tribunal and typically keep the dispute confidential; litigation is a public, state proceeding with a right of appeal. Arbitration can be faster and more procedurally flexible, but offers limited grounds for challenging the outcome.
Yes — thanks to the New York Convention of 1958, to which Poland has been a party since 1961 and which has been ratified by over 170 states, an award issued in one country can be recognized and enforced in another contracting state, following a recognition procedure before that state's courts.
Duration and cost depend on the value in dispute, the number of arbitrators, and case complexity, per the fee schedule of the relevant arbitration institution.
The clause should specify the arbitration institution, the number of arbitrators, the seat and language of proceedings, and the scope of disputes covered. Institutions such as SAKIG publish recommended templates.
It depends on your goal: mediation favors preserving a business relationship and reaching a flexible agreement without a binding award; arbitration provides a final, binding, and readily enforceable outcome when agreement isn't possible.
Domestic arbitration concerns domestic disputes and is usually conducted before national institutions (e.g. SAKIG); international arbitration concerns cross-border disputes and may be conducted before international institutions (e.g. ICC, VIAC), taking private international law into account.
Your matter will be handled by lawyers with litigation and dispute-resolution experience.

Kinga Miller
Partner, Advocate,
Approved Compliance Expert, Approved ESG Officer
Kinga — Partner and Advocate with extensive litigation practice, represents clients in disputes. She combines experience in court litigation with expertise in civil, commercial and competition law.

Michał Wołoszański
Managing Partner,
INSEAD Global Executive MBA, Attorney-at-Law
Michał is the founder and Managing Partner of the firm. An attorney-at-law with an INSEAD Global Executive MBA, he combines legal experience with a business perspective, supporting clients in strategic decisions — including the choice of forum for resolving disputes.

Katarzyna Płonkowska
Associate, Attorney-at-law
Katarzyna is an attorney-at-law (Associate) supporting the team on contentious matters and case documentation — handling day-to-day legal advisory and the factual and legal analysis that feeds dispute strategy.
Let's find the best route to resolution and build the strategy.
Get in touch